![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVMNAElKjNL83YASG-sLhmpubMhifLMhn_EY3CIS5ytH4IEymtitvKrc9aaN0Nr2FzLN0AiRCFepTUGuHqomg1XriGiNx_gVmFBixI2od9NDaY4OKa29gmQh9Ea33eYQxqVwyE5UCWfsg/s320/Calculator.jpg)
As a prequel to a longer/technical article that is currently under review at a journal, Tassos
Kaburakis and I recently published an
essay in
Analytics entitled "Sports Law Analytics."
Analytics is a quasi-academic publication published by the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences ("INFORMS"). There is an accompanying INFORMS
podcast too. Our essay outlines the parameters for expert witness testimony and alludes to some of the quantitative methods often used in sports-related disputes. We specifically highlight the potential role of analytics in
American Needle v. NFL, et al and the
Keller/O'Bannon litigation. Our sequel includes a empirically-driven discussion of the issues highlighted by Mike McCann in a recent
Chronicle article by Brad Wolverton. With the sports industry increasingly turning to analytics for
insight, we have found the application of statistical tools to real-world sports law issues (e.g. the
efficacy of age eligibility rules) to be a fascinating research line.
No comments:
Post a Comment